<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford Mustang &#8211; 1965 vs. 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://snarfed.org/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://snarfed.org</link>
	<description>Ryan Barrett&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 05:50:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://snarfed.org/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-68323</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarfed.org/wordpress/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-68323</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have 2 1965 ford mustangs 289 V8. I am selling one of them if anyone is interested. The mustang I am selling needs some body work. I started to restore it and I just finish both floor pans which came out great. If anyone would like more info about the car I am in New York and you can drop me an email at mmenegalli@gmail.com and I will answer any question about the car. 
Thanks
Mike&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have 2 1965 ford mustangs 289 V8. I am selling one of them if anyone is interested. The mustang I am selling needs some body work. I started to restore it and I just finish both floor pans which came out great. If anyone would like more info about the car I am in New York and you can drop me an email at <a href="mailto:mmenegalli@gmail.com">mmenegalli@gmail.com</a> and I will answer any question about the car. 
Thanks
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://snarfed.org/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-42219</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarfed.org/wordpress/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-42219</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have been reading all your comments about how great the
65 mustang is or was, well I&#039;m 65 and I&#039;ve owned all that old junk when it wasn&#039;t quite so old. I&#039;ve owned a 64 Falcon Sprint and a 65 Mustang, and the Falcon was a whole lot better than the Mustang, now I have an 06 Mustang with a v-6, that has more power than any 65 289, it corners like a slot car on tracks and at 70 mph, it gets 30 mpg on a bad day, it will go from 0 to ticket in 6 sec.and as far as working on them, you better know how to work on them, if you own a 65. So you can keep your old65 mustang and I&#039;ll see you on the freeway while you are working on it, but I&#039;ll wave hello.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;so you kids have fun&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been reading all your comments about how great the
65 mustang is or was, well I&#8217;m 65 and I&#8217;ve owned all that old junk when it wasn&#8217;t quite so old. I&#8217;ve owned a 64 Falcon Sprint and a 65 Mustang, and the Falcon was a whole lot better than the Mustang, now I have an 06 Mustang with a v-6, that has more power than any 65 289, it corners like a slot car on tracks and at 70 mph, it gets 30 mpg on a bad day, it will go from 0 to ticket in 6 sec.and as far as working on them, you better know how to work on them, if you own a 65. So you can keep your old65 mustang and I&#8217;ll see you on the freeway while you are working on it, but I&#8217;ll wave hello.</p>

<p>so you kids have fun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshua</title>
		<link>http://snarfed.org/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarfed.org/wordpress/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-438</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey..i am actually looking to buy a 65&#039; mustang, its in really good shape.&#160; This website helped me alot!!&#160; thanx&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey..i am actually looking to buy a 65&#8242; mustang, its in really good shape.&nbsp; This website helped me alot!!&nbsp; thanx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://snarfed.org/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarfed.org/wordpress/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-439</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My favourite car in the world is the &#039;65 mustang and no matter what would choose it over the &#039;06 mustang GT all because I love mustangs&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favourite car in the world is the &#8217;65 mustang and no matter what would choose it over the &#8217;06 mustang GT all because I love mustangs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://snarfed.org/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarfed.org/wordpress/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-440</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My favourite car in the world is the &#039;65 mustang and no matter what would choose it over the &#039;06 mustang GT all because I love mustangs&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favourite car in the world is the &#8217;65 mustang and no matter what would choose it over the &#8217;06 mustang GT all because I love mustangs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://snarfed.org/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarfed.org/wordpress/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-441</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;looking to sell a 1965 mustang has some rust but in great shape overall&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looking to sell a 1965 mustang has some rust but in great shape overall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marko</title>
		<link>http://snarfed.org/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarfed.org/wordpress/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-442</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i think the 1965 mustang is a crazy car.On good way.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the 1965 mustang is a crazy car.On good way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harriet</title>
		<link>http://snarfed.org/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>harriet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarfed.org/wordpress/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-443</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;65 rock i wolov to ride a stright road&#160; with sunset&#160; 2006 one wicke d but perfer 65 they rock the world and lov horses&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>65 rock i wolov to ride a stright road&nbsp; with sunset&nbsp; 2006 one wicke d but perfer 65 they rock the world and lov horses</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scot</title>
		<link>http://snarfed.org/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarfed.org/wordpress/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-444</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would not trade my 65 for ten new mustangs. with my shelby drop , 650 lbs springs, willwood disk brakes all the way around, 16 inch vintage wheel, T5, 4.11 posi, 524 (net) HP 302. oh yeah the recaro seats make for a comfortable ride. The only way you could feel more connected to the road is have a friend drag you down the asphalt. Did i mention it&#039;s faster than the cookie cutter ponies and still gets 22 mpg. keep your computers, ine weighs in at 2314 pounds with me in it, gota love aluminum everything&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not trade my 65 for ten new mustangs. with my shelby drop , 650 lbs springs, willwood disk brakes all the way around, 16 inch vintage wheel, T5, 4.11 posi, 524 (net) HP 302. oh yeah the recaro seats make for a comfortable ride. The only way you could feel more connected to the road is have a friend drag you down the asphalt. Did i mention it&#8217;s faster than the cookie cutter ponies and still gets 22 mpg. keep your computers, ine weighs in at 2314 pounds with me in it, gota love aluminum everything</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seth</title>
		<link>http://snarfed.org/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarfed.org/wordpress/ford_mustang_1965_vs_2006#comment-445</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;yeah i&#039;ev got a 65 v-8-289...personally, i prefer older to younger any day. im 20 years old, driving a cherry red chick magnet...ahahaha...but seriously! i saw you mentioned you can feel the road in the classic, and i completely agree, if you&#039;ve got this car, then you know EXACTLY what he&#039;s talking about. i&#039;ve been restoring mine for 7 years with my grandpa till i finally finished it about 6 months ago. i&#039;ve got a Holley 4160, race suspension, the interior is immaculate-i mean i can almost guarantee my car looks nicer inside then the new 2007&#039;s ahahha....all black and chrome inside, looks like a brand new old car. what i really love about the 289&#039;s is the smooth power, it goes from cruise&#039;n to burnin&#039; rubber with no effort at all....i think the old mustangs have much more character and personality than any newer car....i&#039;d never give up my 65....i get offers for it everyday i drive it....which is almost everyday....and i this car holds up great...if you like to work on cars, or would like to, and your looking to get an old classic-this is the car for you....its awesome...im dead serious....anyways....just thought i&#039;d leave my 2 cents. take it easy guys and let keep the ponies on the road!~&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah i&#8217;ev got a 65 v-8-289&#8230;personally, i prefer older to younger any day. im 20 years old, driving a cherry red chick magnet&#8230;ahahaha&#8230;but seriously! i saw you mentioned you can feel the road in the classic, and i completely agree, if you&#8217;ve got this car, then you know EXACTLY what he&#8217;s talking about. i&#8217;ve been restoring mine for 7 years with my grandpa till i finally finished it about 6 months ago. i&#8217;ve got a Holley 4160, race suspension, the interior is immaculate-i mean i can almost guarantee my car looks nicer inside then the new 2007&#8242;s ahahha&#8230;.all black and chrome inside, looks like a brand new old car. what i really love about the 289&#8242;s is the smooth power, it goes from cruise&#8217;n to burnin&#8217; rubber with no effort at all&#8230;.i think the old mustangs have much more character and personality than any newer car&#8230;.i&#8217;d never give up my 65&#8230;.i get offers for it everyday i drive it&#8230;.which is almost everyday&#8230;.and i this car holds up great&#8230;if you like to work on cars, or would like to, and your looking to get an old classic-this is the car for you&#8230;.its awesome&#8230;im dead serious&#8230;.anyways&#8230;.just thought i&#8217;d leave my 2 cents. take it easy guys and let keep the ponies on the road!~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

