<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE content [ <!ENTITY nbsp " "> ]>
<rdf:RDF xml:base="http://snarfed.org/rdf"
         xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">

<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://snarfed.org">
  <dc:title> snarfed.org  </dc:title>
  <dc:description> draw group stream of consciousness </dc:description>
  <dc:creator> Ryan Barrett &lt;snarfed at ryanb dot org&gt; </dc:creator>
  <dc:language> en </dc:language>
  <dc:format> text/html </dc:format>
  <dc:rights> Copyright 2002-2007 Ryan Barrett </dc:rights>
</rdf:Description>

<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://snarfed.org/space/2007-04-13">
  <dc:title> 2007-04-13 </dc:title>
  <dc:creator> Ryan Barrett &lt;snarfed at ryanb dot org&gt; </dc:creator>
  <dc:date> 2007-04-13T23:19:00Z </dc:date>
  <dc:language> en </dc:language>
  <dc:format> text/html </dc:format>
  <dc:rights> Copyright 2002-2007 Ryan Barrett </dc:rights>

  <content>
    <h3>Key signing party</h3>

<p>!<img src="/space/key_signing.jpg" alt="key signing" title="" /></p>

<p>I have a reputation for being a bit of a
<a href="/space/privacy+through+prepaid+credit+cards">privacy freak</a>.
Given that, it's a little
odd that I <a href="/space/2004-10-03">didn't have a PGP key until 2004</a>,
since <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cypherpunk">cypherpunks</a>
and privacy freaks tend to love <a href="http://www.pgp.net/pgp-faq/">PGP</a>.</p>

<p>What's even more odd is that, until today, I'd never been to a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_signing_party">key signing
party</a>! We had a small one at
work, so I finally have some signatures on my key. Very cool.</p>

<p>From a sociological point of view, the evolution of key signing parties is
utterly fascinating. If you're not a geek, it's similar to being in the mafia.
Mobsters are constantly meeting new recruits and business associates, but they
have to be careful about who they trust. So, when they bring someone new into
the fold, they "vouch" for them.</p>

<p>This is usually good enough, but sometimes they need to work with someone new,
or from out of town. (Understandably, that happens pretty often.) They might not
know the new person directly, but they might know someone else who will vouch
for them. If they're lucky, they might even have two or three friend-of-friend
links. It's not quite as good as vouching directly, but it's close.</p>

<p>Key signing parties are basically the same thing, but with computers, crypto,
geeks, and a healthy dose of paranoia. Similar to
<a href="http://people.howstuffworks.com/mafia1.htm">La Cosa Nostra</a>,
key signing parties have developed a fair amount of
<a href="http://linuxreviews.org/howtos/gnupg/signingparty/">structure</a>,
<a href="http://www.keysigning.org/methods/adhoc">coordination</a>, and even
<a href="http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/121645/49/">etiquette</a>. For
example, ironically, laptops and PDAs are <em>frowned</em> upon, since the goal is to
verify identities and keys
<a href="http://catb.org/jargon/html/O/out-of-band.html">out of band</a>, in person.</p>

<p>It was great, geeky fun. Now that I know the ropes, I'll have to go to another
one. On an unrelated note,
<a href="http://scientificamerican.com/podcast/podcast.mp3?e_id=E749295D-E7F2-99DF-34BCD6AC79A196CA&amp;ref=p_sciam">happy Friday the 13th</a>!</p>

  </content>

  <rdf:Seq>

  </rdf:Seq>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
